Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)25 Section 139(1)18 Section 143(1)12 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction6 Section 43B5 Section 434 Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

In the result, appeal filed by the assesseeis in ITA No

ITA 21/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Rugs Mart Deputy Commissioner Of Barhi Ewada V. Income Tax (Cpc), Centralized District Varanasi-221207 Processing Center , U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (The Dcit , Circle-3, Varanasi, U.P.) Pan:Aalfr4883R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. R.K.N.Jaiswal,AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

36(1)(va) of the Act? (b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI