BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 274clear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata159Mumbai152Delhi117Karnataka101Chennai82Bangalore75Jaipur72Ahmedabad66Pune61Surat61Cochin47Hyderabad47Visakhapatnam39Indore25Chandigarh23Lucknow18Cuttack17Ranchi12Amritsar11Agra11Rajkot11Calcutta10Raipur10Guwahati6Patna5Nagpur5Allahabad5Jabalpur4Varanasi4Telangana2Dehradun2Jodhpur2Rajasthan1SC1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 271F7Section 271(1)(b)7Section 285B5Section 271(1)(c)3Section 2743Section 142(1)3Penalty3Section 124(3)(a)2Section 124(2)

GORAKH NATH YADAV,VARANASI vs. ITA, WARD - 3(4), VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 26/VNS/2023[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Oct 2023AY 2004-2005
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted for hearing. 4. The assessee is aggrieved by penalty of Rs.3,50,162/- on account of addition made under the head long term capital gain of Rs.16,10,438/-. Before us, ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that, firstly while initiating the penalty proceedings

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)
2
Addition to Income2
Section 124(2)
Section 124(3)(a)
Section 250(1)
Section 255(4)
Section 69A

condoning the delay citing the reasons for the delay in filing before the Delhi benches, if so advised. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. 9. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.09.2023. (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 26th September, 2023. 8. In view of the above discussion, I find that after the judgement

SMT. ANITA AWASTHI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD - 3(5), SONEBHADRA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 243/VNS/2019[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Jun 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2010-11 Smt. Anita Awasthi, Ito, Ward-3(5), 1142, Block-36, V. Income Tax Office, Sonebhadra, Rangoli Gardens, Uttar Pradesh Kanakpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302021 Pan:Acbpa9520E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri T.P. Shukla, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(b)Section 273B

condone the delay in filing appeal. 6. In the aforesaid circumstances, the assesses appellant has suffered Injustice and has come before your goodself by way of appeal and requests for relief after considering the case of the appellant sympathetically, The appellant begs to submit as under: i. No notice u/s 142(1) could be served upon the appellant

SUB REGISTRAR (SAIDPUR),GHAZIPUR vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (I &CI), LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal filed by the appellant in ITA no

ITA 46/VNS/2020[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Smt. Madhuri Gautam,<br>Sub Registrar,SaidpurFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 271FSection 274Section 285B

274 of the 1961 Act, show causing the appellant as to why penalty should not be imposed on the appellant for failure to furnish statement of financial transaction. Again no compliance was made by the appellant. Further opportunity was also given by A.O, but, the appellant again did not make any compliance, which led A.O. to impose penalty of Rs.4