Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)21 Section 139(1)14 Section 143(1)13 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction4 Section 143(1)(a)3 Section 249(4)(b)3 Section 43B3 Section 11

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 51/VNS/2022[2012-2013]Status: HeardITAT Varanasi12 Jan 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Ramit Kocharassessment Year:2012-13 Shri Prakash Yadav, Income Tax Officer, Rampur, Boha, Akhar, V. Ward-2(4), Ballia-277401, Uttar Pradesh Ballia-277401, U.P. Pan:Agvpy3320Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 210Section 249(4)(b)Section 250

249(4)(b) of the income tax Act, The appellant has only the agricultural income, hence the said provision may not be applicable in the appellant case. And order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (A) is deserve to be quashed. 8. Because, the appellant craves for a right to raise any additional ground during the course of hearing

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

BRIJ BIHARI DUBEY EDUCATIONAL TRUST,GORAKHPUR vs. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI