Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)21 Section 139(1)14 Section 143(1)13 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction4 Section 249(4)(b)3 Section 143(1)(a)3 Section 43B3 Section 148

BRIJ BIHARI DUBEY EDUCATIONAL TRUST,GORAKHPUR vs. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 45/VNS/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi24 Feb 2023AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2014-15 Brij Bihari Dubey Educational Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner C-251, Budh Vihar, Taramandal, Of Income Tax-Cpc, Gorakhpur-273001, Uttar Pradesh Bangalore Pan-Aabtb7657D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Subhash Chand, Adv & Sh. Ashutosh Bhardwaj, Adv Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 09.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 24.02.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Chand, Adv & ShFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

condoned. The CIT(A) was not impressed with the explanation of the assessee for delay of 1950 days’ in filing the appeal. The CIT(A) has held that the assessee failed to exercise its right to file appeal within the period of limitation provided under section 249(2) and it is a clear case of laches on the part

BRIJ BIHARI DUBEY EDUCATIONAL TRUST,GORAKHPUR vs. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

BRIJ BIHARI DUBEY EDUCATIONAL TRUST,GORAKHPUR vs. THE DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI