BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 210clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai147Chennai135Karnataka133Delhi62Kolkata58Bangalore56Ahmedabad47Jaipur39Pune29Surat22Hyderabad21Chandigarh19Indore15Dehradun11Cuttack11Amritsar9Lucknow9Cochin6Jabalpur6Guwahati5Patna5Telangana5Visakhapatnam4Calcutta3Raipur3Varanasi2Panaji2Orissa1Rajasthan1SC1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 249(4)(b)3Section 1482Section 124(3)(a)2Section 124(2)2Section 250(1)2Addition to Income2

SHRI PRAKASH YADAV,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 51/VNS/2022[2012-2013]Status: HeardITAT Varanasi12 Jan 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Ramit Kocharassessment Year:2012-13 Shri Prakash Yadav, Income Tax Officer, Rampur, Boha, Akhar, V. Ward-2(4), Ballia-277401, Uttar Pradesh Ballia-277401, U.P. Pan:Agvpy3320Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 210Section 249(4)(b)Section 250

210 by the previous income not for the income earn during the year. 3. Because the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) was not justified that the reason recorded u/s 148 for reassessment were not provided to the appellant before completion of assessment and only on the basis of AIR information regarding cash deposited in the bank Rs.1130000.00 has reopen

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)Section 124(2)Section 124(3)(a)Section 250(1)Section 255(4)Section 69A

condoning the delay citing the reasons for the delay in filing before the Delhi benches, if so advised. 8. In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed. 9. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.09.2023. (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated 26th September, 2023. 8. In view of the above discussion, I find that after the judgement