Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2(24)(x)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)25 Section 139(1)18 Section 143(1)12 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction6 Section 43B5 Section 434 Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

In the result, appeal filed by the assesseeis in ITA No

ITA 21/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Rugs Mart Deputy Commissioner Of Barhi Ewada V. Income Tax (Cpc), Centralized District Varanasi-221207 Processing Center , U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (The Dcit , Circle-3, Varanasi, U.P.) Pan:Aalfr4883R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. R.K.N.Jaiswal,AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

x) of clause (24) of section 2 apply, if such sum is credited by the assessee to the employee's account in the relevant fund or funds on or before the due date. Explanation - For the purposes of this clause, 'due date' means the date by which the assessee is required as an employer to credit an employee's contribution

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI