Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 192clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)25 Section 139(1)18 Section 143(1)12 Section 2(24)(x)6 Deduction6 Section 43B5 Section 434 Addition to Income3 Section 143(3)

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

In the result, appeal filed by the assesseeis in ITA No

ITA 21/VNS/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Rugs Mart Deputy Commissioner Of Barhi Ewada V. Income Tax (Cpc), Centralized District Varanasi-221207 Processing Center , U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (The Dcit , Circle-3, Varanasi, U.P.) Pan:Aalfr4883R (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. R.K.N.Jaiswal,AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condoned. In the present case we are concerned with the law as it stood prior to the amendment of section 43B. In the circumstances, the assessee was entitled to claim the benefit in section 43B for that period particularly in view of the fact that he has contributed to provident fund before filing of the return. Special leave petition

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI