M/S RUGS MART,VARANASI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

In the result, appeal filed by the assesseeis in ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Rugs Mart Deputy Commissioner Of Barhi Ewada V. Income Tax (Cpc), Centralized District Varanasi-221207 Processing Center , U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (The Dcit , Circle-3, Varanasi, U.P.) Pan:Aalfr4883R (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

M.W.S. & CO.,BHADOHI vs. DY. C.I.T., RANGE - 1, VARANASI

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20 M.W.S. & Co., Naya Bazar V. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Road, Bhadohi-221401, Uttar Central Processing Centre (Cpc), Pradesh, India Bengaluru [Jurisdictional Assessing Pan-Aaffm2003E Officer Being Dy./Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1, Varanasi, U.P. (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

BHUPENDRA NATH PANDEY,VARANASI vs. ACIT, R - 03, VARANASI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Bhupendra Nath Pandey Assistant Director Of Income 6-159/27, Kashi Enclave V. Tax (Cpc), Centralized Colony, Pahadiya Sarnath, Processing Center , Varanasi-221007, U.P. Bengaluru-560500 (The Acit, Range-3, Varanasi, U.P.) Pan:Ajfpp1273J (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

LAWKUSH SHARMA,SONEBHADRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3 (5), SONEBHADRA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 Lawkush Sharma Assistant Director Of Income 14-495, V.V. Colony, V. Tax (Cpc), Centralized Shakti Nagar, Sonebhadra- Processing Center , 231222, U.P. Bengaluru-560500 Pan:Artps9822Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

UTKARSH SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.,VARANASI vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is in ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Utkarsh Small Finance National E-Assessment Centre, Bank Limited V. Delhi S-24/1-2, First Floor, Mahavir Nagar, Orderly Bazar, Near Mahavir Mandir, Varanasi- 221001, U.P. Pan:Aabcu9355J (Appellant) (Respondent)

b) Whether the deletion of the 2nd proviso to section 43B by way of amendment by the Finance Act, 2003 is retrospective in nature" (p. 2) 16. These questions were answered by the Division Bench in the following manner : — "7. Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, as well as, the assessee, we are of the view that

THE SPRINGER EDUCATION FOUNDATION,,GORAKHPUR vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

condone the delay vests with CBDT by virtue of provisions of Section 119(2)(b) of the 1961 Act. Reference

BANKA ATITHI BHAWAN TRUST,,GORAKHPUR vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assesseein ITA No

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2016-17 Banka Atithibhawan Trust, Commissioner Of Income-Tax C/O Banka Atithibhawan, V. (Exemptions), Maya Bazar, Gorakhpur- 5Th Floor, Tc-46, Vibhutikhand, 273001, U.P. Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, U.P. Pan:Aaatb8576G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Mr. Ashishbansal, Advocate Respondent By: Shriamalendunath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 13.01.2023

119(2)(b) as not been maintainable. It was submitted that although this appeal is not maintainable before tribunal, but even if it would have been maintainable still this appeal otherwise was also filed belatedly with tribunal beyond the time prescribed u/s 253(3) of the 1961 Act. The order of ld. CIT(E) is dated 26.12.2019, which was received

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

119/- on sale of shares to M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessee has filed return of income on 30/07/2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,30,510/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the precise issue of examining long term capital gain on the sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessment was completed vide order dated

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

119/- on sale of shares to M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessee has filed return of income on 30/07/2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,30,510/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the precise issue of examining long term capital gain on the sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessment was completed vide order dated

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

119/- on sale of shares to M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessee has filed return of income on 30/07/2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,30,510/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the precise issue of examining long term capital gain on the sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessment was completed vide order dated

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

119/- on sale of shares to M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessee has filed return of income on 30/07/2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,30,510/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the precise issue of examining long term capital gain on the sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessment was completed vide order dated

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

119/- on sale of shares to M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessee has filed return of income on 30/07/2014 declaring total income of Rs.7,30,510/-. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny on the precise issue of examining long term capital gain on the sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. The assessment was completed vide order dated