Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai56 Kolkata54 Ahmedabad29 Jaipur12 Hyderabad10 Chandigarh10 Delhi10 Surat7 Indore6 Varanasi5 Chennai5 Pune5 Rajkot4 Lucknow3 Patna2 Bangalore2 Guwahati1 Cuttack1 Agra1 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10 Section 2635 Capital Gains5 Long Term Capital Gains5 Penny Stock5 Survey u/s 133A5 Revision u/s 2635

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016

Section 143(3)Section 263

penny stocks were manipulated. In the said report there was an information regarding sale of shares of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. also and AO was given the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, a promoter of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. wherein he has admitted that share prices of the company, M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. was manipulated by Shri Natwar

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016

Section 143(3)

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR