Search: charitable trust | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 60clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi457 Karnataka456 Mumbai363 Bangalore220 Chennai219 Ahmedabad126 Jaipur119 Chandigarh82 Kolkata65 Pune64 Hyderabad59 Lucknow40 Indore29 Cuttack29 Cochin27 Visakhapatnam25 Amritsar24 Calcutta17 Agra14 Allahabad14 Telangana13 Surat12 Rajkot12 Jodhpur8 SC8 Guwahati6 Varanasi5 Patna4 Nagpur3 Andhra Pradesh2 Jabalpur2 Panaji2 Punjab & Haryana2 Raipur2 Rajasthan2 Dehradun1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)16 Section 2(15)12 Section 1011 Section 118 Section 12A5 Exemption5 Section 124

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 264/ALLD/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi06 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: ShriAshishBansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriSunil Bajpai, CIT- D.R

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 265/ALLD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi06 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: ShriAshishBansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriSunil Bajpai, CIT- D.R

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 266/ALLD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi06 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: ShriAshishBansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriSunil Bajpai, CIT- D.R

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

ITA 267/ALLD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi06 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: ShriAshishBansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: ShriSunil Bajpai, CIT- D.R

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

Section 60 to 63 of the 1961 Act deals with revocable transfer of assets, and for creation of valid trust, transfer of the assets for charitable

GYAN PEETH TRUST,SONEBHADRA vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 163/VNS/2019[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi15 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: N.A. Gyanpeeth Trust, The Cit(Exemption), Ternahi, Robertsganj, T.C. 46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, Up State Construction& Uttar Pradesh V. Infrastructure Development Corporation, Vibhutikhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh Pan:Aabtg9961D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Zafar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Ramendra Kumar

Section 10Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

charitable purposes and allegedly exaggerated and bogus expenses were claimed. Based on material on record, the ld. CIT(E) observed that the activities of the assessee were not genuine , and it was also observed that the part of income was applied for the benefit of persons specified in Section 13(1)(c) read with Section