BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 46(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka466Delhi457Mumbai331Chennai148Bangalore148Jaipur118Ahmedabad109Hyderabad88Pune69Chandigarh62Kolkata54Lucknow39Cochin38Indore29Cuttack28Visakhapatnam18Calcutta16Rajkot14Nagpur13Amritsar13Allahabad12Telangana10Agra10Patna9SC7Surat7Kerala6Raipur5Rajasthan5Varanasi4Jodhpur4Dehradun2Ranchi1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1011Section 14810Section 12A5Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2Section 1472Exemption2

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in respect of which he is assessable as a representative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this Act without giving effect

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in respect of which he is assessable as a representative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this Act without giving effect

MATH GARWA GHAT GO-SANRAKSHAN NYAS,VARANASI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/VNS/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi29 Sept 2023

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year:N.A. Math Garwa Ghat Go-Sanrakshan V. The Cit (Exemptions) Nyas Varanasi 1, Bangla Kuti, Ramna Varanasi Tan/Pan:Aaatm8624J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jindal & Shri V. K. Jindal Respondent By: Shri Robin Chaudhary, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 25 09 2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 29 09 2023

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jindal & shri V. K. JindalFor Respondent: Shri Robin Chaudhary, CIT (DR)
Section 11Section 12A

1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in the Law, the CIT (Exemptions) has grossly erred in denying/rejecting registration to the assessee u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (of the Act) as claimed. :-2-: 2. That the learned CIT has erred in law and on facts in not granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing

GYAN PEETH TRUST,SONEBHADRA vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 163/VNS/2019[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi15 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: N.A. Gyanpeeth Trust, The Cit(Exemption), Ternahi, Robertsganj, T.C. 46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, Up State Construction& Uttar Pradesh V. Infrastructure Development Corporation, Vibhutikhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh Pan:Aabtg9961D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Zafar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Ramendra Kumar
Section 10Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, UP State Construction& Uttar Pradesh v. Infrastructure Development Corporation, VibhutiKhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh PAN:AABTG9961D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Zafar, Advocate Respondent by: Mr.Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CITDR Date of hearing: 25.03.2022 Date of pronouncement: 18 .04.2022 O R D E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT