BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(46)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka466Delhi450Mumbai314Bangalore148Chennai140Jaipur112Ahmedabad102Hyderabad87Pune66Chandigarh61Kolkata50Lucknow39Cochin37Indore29Cuttack27Visakhapatnam18Calcutta16Rajkot14Allahabad12Amritsar12Agra10Telangana9Nagpur8Surat7SC7Kerala6Raipur5Patna5Rajasthan4Varanasi4Jodhpur4Dehradun2Andhra Pradesh1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Ranchi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 1011Section 14810Section 80G(5)4Section 144r2Section 1442Section 143(2)2Section 1472Exemption2

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in respect of which he is assessable as a representative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this Act without giving effect

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

charitable or religious purposes or in part only for such purposes, or of income being voluntary contributions referred to in sub-clause (iia) of clause (24) of section 2, shall, if the total income in respect of which he is assessable as a representative assessee (the total income for this purpose being computed under this Act without giving effect

SANT KACHACHA BABA LOK SEWA TRUST,,VARANASI vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 319/ALLD/2017[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi22 Apr 2022AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: ShriRahul R. Gabhawala, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Bajpai, CIT DR
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

46,042/- respectively, which is an exponential 2 Assessment Year: N.A. SantKachacha Baba LokSewa Trust, Varanasi increase in the fee being levied. The ld. CIT(E) also observed that the assessee has failed to implement/ invest the same funds towards the execution of any charitable objects. The ld. CIT(E) also observed that the assessee has claimed exaggerated and mostly

GYAN PEETH TRUST,SONEBHADRA vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

ITA 163/VNS/2019[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi15 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: N.A. Gyanpeeth Trust, The Cit(Exemption), Ternahi, Robertsganj, T.C. 46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, Up State Construction& Uttar Pradesh V. Infrastructure Development Corporation, Vibhutikhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh Pan:Aabtg9961D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Zafar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr.Ramendra Kumar
Section 10Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, UP State Construction& Uttar Pradesh v. Infrastructure Development Corporation, VibhutiKhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh PAN:AABTG9961D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Mr. Arvind Shukla, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Zafar, Advocate Respondent by: Mr.Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CITDR Date of hearing: 25.03.2022 Date of pronouncement: 18 .04.2022 O R D E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT