VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

sections 2(15), 10(20), 10(20A) and 12A of the Income- tax Act, 1961- Charitable or religious trust- Registration

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

sections 2(15), 10(20), 10(20A) and 12A of the Income- tax Act, 1961- Charitable or religious trust- Registration

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

10 or] section 10A or section 10B or section 10BA or Chapter VI-A exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year, in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

10 or] section 10A or section 10B or section 10BA or Chapter VI-A exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall, on or before the due date, furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year, in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner

MATH GARWA GHAT (TRUST),VARANASI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year: N.A. Math Gadwaghat Trust V. The Cit (Exemptions) Bangla Kuti, Ramna Varanasi Varanasi Tan/Pan:Aaets8008G (Appellant) (Respondent)

charitable activities. 9. The ld. CIT (Exemptions) has not considered the details which were filed along with replies to various show cause notices, in which all these aspects have duly been explained. Thus, the finding and observation of the ld. CIT (Exemptions) is set aside. Accordingly, we direct the ld. CIT (Exemptions) to grant registration to the assessee-trust under

BLOSSAM HOUSE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,VARANASI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 3(1), VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2018-19 Blossam House Educational V. Income Tax Officer, Society, 579, Teliabagh, Church Ward-3(1), Varanasi Compound, Maldahiya, Varanasi Pan-Aaatb7686D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Atul Choudhary, C.A. Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.07.2022 O R D E R

trust. An identical amount of Rs. 19,90,762/- is also shown in the column giving details of exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). From these facts, it is clear that the amount showed as exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) is nothing but the amount of accumulated income to be applied for charitable

CENTRAL CHARITABLE TRUST,JAFARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalecentral Charitable Trust Vs. Income Tax Officer Jafrapur- 276001, Exemption, Uttar Pradesh. Wardayakarbhawan, Maqboolalam Road, Varanasi 221002 Uttar Pradesh Pan/Gir No. : Aabtc4875G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shriarvind Shukla, Advocate Respondentby : Shri A.K. Singh, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 12.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 12.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Cit(A)Passed U/S.250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961.The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: Central Charitable Trust “1. Because The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Dismissing The Appeal Of The Trust Running Educational Institution Without Appreciating The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case In The Correct Perspective. 2. Because The Learned Ao As Well As The Learned Cit(A) Have Failed To Appreciate That The Assessee Is Engaged Solely In Running An Educational Institution Having Gross Receipts Below One Crore & Hence No Part Of His Receipts/Income Was Taxable By Virtue Of Clear Unambiguous Provisions Of Section 10(232)(Iiiad). 3. Because The Authorities Below Have Sought To Deny The Benefit Available To The Educational Institution By Clear Provisions Of Section 10(23C)(Iiiad) With Unrelated Provisions Of Section 11/12A When Such Sections Should Not Be Applied To The Facts Of The Case. 4. Because The Authorities Below Have Sought To Deny The Benefit Available To The Educational Institution On The Basis Of Some Inadvertent Technical Errors In Filing Return Without Appreciating The Facts Of The Case. 5. Because The Order Is Bad In Law As Well As On Facts.”

Section 10A/10AA of the Act which is not part of the assessee claims and has confirmed the action of the Assessing Officer and Central Charitable Trust dismissed the assessee appeal. The assessee could not establish its claim for deduction u/s 10

THE SPRINGER EDUCATION FOUNDATION,,GORAKHPUR vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

Section 10(23C) introduced w.e.f. 01.06.2006 vide Finance Act, 2006 as amended by Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 w.r.e.f. 1.4.2009 states as under: “……. Provided also that in case the fund or trust or institution or any university or other educational institution or any hospital or other medical institution referred to in the purpose of grant of exemption or continuance thereof, such

SHRI HARISHANKAR SINGH & SMT. SAROJ DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST,,KUSHINAGAR vs. DCIT, RANGE - II, GORAKHPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2011-12 Shri Harishankar Singh & Smt. V. Dy. Cit, Saroj Devi Charitable Trust, Range-Ii, Gorakhpur Kushinagar, U.P. Pan-Aahas7138P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. R.L. Verma, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 25.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.05.2022

section 69 of the Income Tax Act as an unexplained investment for purchase of land. The assessee challenged the action of the AO before the CIT(A) and contended that there was no exchange of purchase consideration as the land in question was transferred by the trustee/manager of the assessee trust without any consideration. However, the Sh. Harishankar Singh

GONA FOUNDATION TRUST,,ROBERTSGANJ vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kocharn.A. Gona Foundation Trust, V. Cit-(Exemption), Ward-16, Akhara Mohal, Lucknow Robertsganj, Sonebhadra-231216 Pan-Aactg9390H (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. K.R. Singh, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, Cit D.R. Date Of Hearing: 26.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.05.2022

section 12AA(1)(b) of the Act, two factors namely the object of charitable purpose and the genuineness of activities have to be proved before granting the registration. However, the applicant failed to prove the same. Hence, the applicant trust has not made a case for granting the registration u/s 12AA(1)(b).” 5. It is clear from para

GYAN PEETH TRUST,SONEBHADRA vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: N.A. Gyanpeeth Trust, The Cit(Exemption), Ternahi, Robertsganj, T.C. 46-V , Sonebhadra-222645, Up State Construction& Uttar Pradesh V. Infrastructure Development Corporation, Vibhutikhand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh Pan:Aabtg9961D (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961(hereinafter called “ the CIT(E)”) Assessment Year: N.A. GyanPeeth Trust, Sonebhadra, U.P. rejecting /dismissing application filed by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 10(23C) of the 1961 Act.We have heard both the partiesin Open Court through physical hearing mode. 2. The brief facts of the case are that

SANT KACHACHA BABA LOK SEWA TRUST,,VARANASI vs. CIT (E), LUCKNOW

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

10,000/- for financial year 2015-16 and 2016-17, but no details/lease deed/rent agreement were submitted by assessee, which raises serious concerns about misuse of funds of the assessee for the benefit of persons referred to in Section 3 Assessment Year: N.A. SantKachacha Baba LokSewa Trust, Varanasi 13(3) of the 1961 Act. Thus, in nut-shell