AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL (HUF),VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VARANASI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 34/VNS/2021[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jul 2022AY 2014-2015
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharay: 2014-15 Ajay Kumar Agrawal (Huf), V Assistant Commissioner Of 72, Jawahar Nagar Extension Bhelupur, . Income Tax, Central Circle, Varanasi-221005, Uttar Pradesh, India Varanasi Pan-Aagha9912D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Asim Zafar, Adv Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.07.2022 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Asim Zafar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 4Section 44ASection 68
Capital Gain by invoking the provisions of section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged the original assessment order and filed appeal before the CIT(A) and thereafter, the matter was carried to this Tribunal in ITA
No.50/VNS/2019. In the meantime, the assessee opted for Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2020 to settle the tax disputes arising from
