VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

capital gain shown in the return of income. From the perusal of the assessment order, it is seen that AO after following entire evidences and explanations had observed and held as under:- In this return of income, the assessee has claimed exemption on LTCG earned from securities

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

capital gain shown in the return of income. From the perusal of the assessment order, it is seen that AO after following entire evidences and explanations had observed and held as under:- In this return of income, the assessee has claimed exemption on LTCG earned from securities

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

capital gain shown in the return of income. From the perusal of the assessment order, it is seen that AO after following entire evidences and explanations had observed and held as under:- In this return of income, the assessee has claimed exemption on LTCG earned from securities

RADHEY SHYAM,AGRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3), VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the assesseein ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year:2012-13 Shriradheyshyam Income Tax Officer, 308, Sector 16, Avasvikas Colony V. Ward-2(3),Aayakarbhawan, Sikandra,Agra-282007, U.P.. Maqboolalam Road Pan:Aikps7948H Varanasi-221002,U.P.. (Appellant) (Respondent)

CAPITAL GAIN is wholly wrong and against the facts of the case. 3. That in any case the authorities below have not allowed the proper opportunity to explain the case. 4. That the authorities below have erred in holding the cost of acquisition of property to be nil as per provision of the Income Tax Act read with section 48