MANISH JAISWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. ADDL. CIT, (TDS), ALLAHABAD
ITA 216/VNS/2019[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi31 May 2022AY 2016-2017
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2016-17 Mr. Manish Jaiswal, Addl.Cit (Tds), Prop. New Manish Medical V. Allahabad-211001, U.P. Agencies Pashupati Market, Gandhi Park, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pan: Akdpj7675D (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 194ISection 271CSection 273BSection 274
capital gain in his return filed by him and there is overall no loss of revenue to the department, so looking to the facts in its entirely, the benefit of section 273B should have been allowed by the CIT(A) while passing the impugned appellate order dated 16.07.2019. 5. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts
