MEENA DEVI,BALLIA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), BALLIA
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 39/VNS/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi16 Oct 2023AY 2019-2020
Bench: The Ld. Cit (A) It Was Challenged That Taking The Sale Consideration As Per The Stamp Valuation Authority U/S.50C Is Beyond The Scope Of Section 143(1)(A) & There Is No Such Provision Mentioned In Provision (I) To (Vi) To Make Such An Adjustment. Further, It Was Contended That The Assessee Had Disputed The Valuation U/S.50C Before The Ld. Ao In The Petition For Rectification U/S. 154, However, Same Has Not Been Accepted. However, The Ld. Cit (A) Has Confirmed The Addition On The Ground That The Provision Of Section 50C Is Clear That The Value Has To Be Taken As Per The Stamp Valuation Authority & Therefore, The Ld. Ao Has Rightly Made The Adjustment.
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 154Section 50CSection 50C(2)
Section 50C for computation of the capital gain instead of sale consideration shown by the assessee. Thereafter, assessee filed an application u/s.154 and in the rectification of intimation u/s.143(1) r.w.s.
154