BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,216Delhi1,292Chennai841Ahmedabad510Bangalore507Jaipur493Kolkata416Surat326Hyderabad324Pune214Indore173Chandigarh170Karnataka144Cochin121Raipur106Rajkot105Visakhapatnam101Nagpur79Calcutta66Lucknow60Amritsar55Agra52Guwahati50Patna40Cuttack24Ranchi18Jodhpur18Panaji15Dehradun15Jabalpur12SC11Allahabad7Varanasi7Telangana5Kerala3Orissa2Rajasthan2Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 14810Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Survey u/s 133A5Revision u/s 2635Section 144r

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)
2
Section 1442
Section 143(2)2
Section 1472
Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reopening of the assessment was validly done by the AO. Reference is drawn to provisions of Section 147 and 148 of the 1961 Act , which were in force at relevant time reads as under: Income escaping assessment. 147. If the [Assessing] Officer [has reason to believe] that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

reopening of the assessment was validly done by the AO. Reference is drawn to provisions of Section 147 and 148 of the 1961 Act , which were in force at relevant time reads as under: Income escaping assessment. 147. If the [Assessing] Officer [has reason to believe] that any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year