BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,127Delhi600Chennai392Ahmedabad351Jaipur285Kolkata199Bangalore181Hyderabad176Pune139Chandigarh115Indore114Surat99Cochin99Raipur91Rajkot78Nagpur73Visakhapatnam48Patna39Lucknow37Agra31Guwahati31Amritsar27Cuttack17Jodhpur16Dehradun13Panaji13Ranchi10Jabalpur8Varanasi5Allahabad2

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Survey u/s 133A5Revision u/s 2635

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)
Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

capital gain entries and he has given list of companies who were involved. Thirdly, he has commented upon abnormal raise of prices of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd. 9. In all these cases, nowhere the ld. PCIT has pointed out as to what specific inquiry should have been done by the AO and from whom which he has not done, instead