MIRZA ARIF BEG,GORAKHPUR vs. ACIT, RANGE - 1, GORAKHPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 100/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 May 2022AY 2014-2015
Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2014-15 Mirza Arif Beg, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, H. No. 184-B, New Colony, New Range-1, Gorakhpur Beniganj Chowk, Jafra Bazar, Gorakhpur, U.P. Pan-Abxpb6421C (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Subhash Chand, Advocate Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 26.05.2022
For Appellant: Sh. Subhash Chand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 54F
capital gains.
3. Because the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal has erred in law of facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,39,900/- on account of Commission.
4. Because the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal has erred in law of facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 10,65,509/- on Caretaker Expenses.
5. Because in view
