BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 25clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,284Delhi752Jaipur291Chennai209Kolkata190Ahmedabad183Bangalore156Surat116Chandigarh108Hyderabad90Rajkot87Indore85Raipur77Amritsar67Cochin59Pune55Visakhapatnam54Guwahati38Lucknow32Nagpur31Allahabad30Agra26Jodhpur24Patna22Ranchi14Cuttack11Varanasi7Jabalpur6Dehradun4Panaji3

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Survey u/s 133A6Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Revision u/s 2635Section 69A2Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income - Mr. Ganesh Prasad, Tax, V. S-6/108, Golghar Katchhari, Circle-1, Aayakarbhawan, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Maqboolalam Road Varanasi-221002, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Subash Chand Adv. & Sh. Ashutosh BhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

section. That, as regards the correctness and completeness of accounts of appellant is concerned, the AO has not brought any specific defect on records to challenge the correctness of the books of account. In assessment order AO has admitted that the appellant has filed statement of bank accounts, acknowledgments of monthly VAT returns, Monthly details of Purchases and Sales, Monthly

2

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus long term capital gains and the investigation report by the Investigation wing highlighting the complete modus operandi about how these accommodation entries were provided including the name of the scrips including M/s. Rander Corporation used for the manipulations. He has firstly, referred to the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, who was the promoter and director of M/s. Rander

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus long term capital gains and the investigation report by the Investigation wing highlighting the complete modus operandi about how these accommodation entries were provided including the name of the scrips including M/s. Rander Corporation used for the manipulations. He has firstly, referred to the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, who was the promoter and director of M/s. Rander

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus long term capital gains and the investigation report by the Investigation wing highlighting the complete modus operandi about how these accommodation entries were provided including the name of the scrips including M/s. Rander Corporation used for the manipulations. He has firstly, referred to the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, who was the promoter and director of M/s. Rander

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus long term capital gains and the investigation report by the Investigation wing highlighting the complete modus operandi about how these accommodation entries were provided including the name of the scrips including M/s. Rander Corporation used for the manipulations. He has firstly, referred to the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, who was the promoter and director of M/s. Rander

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

bogus long term capital gains and the investigation report by the Investigation wing highlighting the complete modus operandi about how these accommodation entries were provided including the name of the scrips including M/s. Rander Corporation used for the manipulations. He has firstly, referred to the statement of Shri Amar Chandra Rander, who was the promoter and director of M/s. Rander

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

ITA 136/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Shishir Bajpai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

25-27. It was submitted that the impounded material is placed at page No. 148-149 of the paper book . The ld. CIT DR submitted that the matter can be set aside and restored back for fresh adjudication. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee objected and submitted that the matter cannot be set aside as details were given/furnished before