BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 115clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai378Delhi318Jaipur115Karnataka103Bangalore82Ahmedabad64Chandigarh59Cochin59Surat50Calcutta34Hyderabad32Chennai31Kolkata27Guwahati25Nagpur22Indore20Cuttack18Pune16Raipur16Lucknow10Visakhapatnam9Varanasi5Telangana5Amritsar3Jodhpur2Jabalpur2Patna2Rajkot2SC1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Survey u/s 133A5Revision u/s 2635

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term capital asset in the form

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)
Section 263

115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term capital asset in the form

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term capital asset in the form

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term capital asset in the form

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

115]B" From, a bare reading of the said section and Literal construction of the same about which there is not ambiguity, it is evident that the only requirement to be complied with by an assessee for claiming exemption under section 10(38) is that the consideration should be realized on transfer of long term capital asset in the form