BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 11(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,891Delhi1,134Jaipur326Kolkata283Ahmedabad263Chennai253Bangalore187Chandigarh156Surat155Hyderabad132Indore114Raipur109Rajkot105Pune99Amritsar73Visakhapatnam61Guwahati59Cochin58Lucknow54Nagpur54Agra34Jodhpur33Allahabad33Patna25Cuttack19Ranchi14Dehradun13Jabalpur8Varanasi7Panaji3

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Survey u/s 133A6Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Revision u/s 2635Section 69A2Addition to Income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. M/S RATANDEEP GOLD & DIAMOND PVT. LTD., CHANDAULI

ITA 136/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi03 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner M/S Ratandeep Gold & Diamond Of Income Tax, V. Pvt. Ltd. Circle-1, M A Road, 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P. Pan:Aahcr4764Q (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 02/Vns/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 136/Vns/2020) Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Ratandeep Gold & The Deputy Commissioner Of Diamond Pvt. Ltd. V. Income Tax,Circle-1, M.A. Road 19, New Mohal, Varanasi-211001, U.P. Near Balika Inter College, Mugalsarai, Chandauli- 232101, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Shishir Bajpai, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 69A

11,520.27 by incorporating bogus expenses in books of accounts to suppress profits and reduce tax liability. The presumption u/s 292C shall apply that the impounded material belong to assessee and contents shall be presumed to be true, and the assessee having failed to rebut the same, the said addition stood confirmed. This leaves us with two travel bills

2

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

2. He further noted that Investigation Wing has given the name of the entities, who have purchased the scrip of M/s. Rander Corporation Ltd., namely, M/s. JVL Agro Industries Ltd; Smt. Anju Jhunjhunwala and Shri Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, thus this was tainted transactions. 5.2 He further observed that, in the case of M/s. JVL Industries Agro Ltd, a family concern

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 01,, VARANASI vs. SHRI GANESH PRASAD,, VARANASI

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 138/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Feb 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2017-18 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income - Mr. Ganesh Prasad, Tax, V. S-6/108, Golghar Katchhari, Circle-1, Aayakarbhawan, Varanasi-221002, U.P. Maqboolalam Road Varanasi-221002, U.P.

For Appellant: Shri Subash Chand Adv. & Sh. Ashutosh BhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

bogus sale. The assessee has declared cash sale during the F.Y. 2016-17 as under: Month Cash Sales 7 Assessment Year: 2017-18 DCIT, Circle-1, Varanasi v. Mr. Ganesh Prasad, Varanasi April ,2016 3280522 May,2016 3058628 June ,2016 2884982 July ,2016 3808270 August ,2016 3921453 September ,2016 2673140 Thus, the AO observed that the maximum sales declared