BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “bogus purchases”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,469Delhi444Kolkata239Ahmedabad210Jaipur203Surat107Chandigarh106Chennai100Bangalore77Pune70Rajkot67Raipur61Guwahati58Cochin58Hyderabad54Indore41Nagpur26Amritsar26Visakhapatnam22Patna21Lucknow17Agra13Dehradun9Ranchi7Cuttack6Varanasi6Jodhpur4Jabalpur3SC1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 2635Capital Gains5Long Term Capital Gains5Penny Stock5Survey u/s 133A5Revision u/s 2635

ANJU JHUNJHUNWALA,VARANASI vs. PCIT, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 198/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

assessment been enquired by the AO, then it was incumbent on the ld. PCIT that such a material was relevant piece of material. If this statement is to be taken as only relevant piece of evidence, then entire transaction of these shares in the stock exchange from last several years should be treated as bogus and this scrip was used

SARVESH KUMAR AGARWAL HUF,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/VNS/2019[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)
Section 263

assessment been enquired by the AO, then it was incumbent on the ld. PCIT that such a material was relevant piece of material. If this statement is to be taken as only relevant piece of evidence, then entire transaction of these shares in the stock exchange from last several years should be treated as bogus and this scrip was used

VISHAL KANODIA,VARANASI vs. PCIT,, VARANASI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 85/VNS/2019[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2014-2015
Section 143(3)Section 263

assessment been enquired by the AO, then it was incumbent on the ld. PCIT that such a material was relevant piece of material. If this statement is to be taken as only relevant piece of evidence, then entire transaction of these shares in the stock exchange from last several years should be treated as bogus and this scrip was used

GOPI KRISHNA VINOD KUMAR HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 111/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

assessment been enquired by the AO, then it was incumbent on the ld. PCIT that such a material was relevant piece of material. If this statement is to be taken as only relevant piece of evidence, then entire transaction of these shares in the stock exchange from last several years should be treated as bogus and this scrip was used

VINOD KUMAR SARAF HUF,GORAKHPUR vs. PCIT,, GORAKHPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 112/VNS/2020[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Dec 2023AY 2015-2016
Section 143(3)Section 263

assessment been enquired by the AO, then it was incumbent on the ld. PCIT that such a material was relevant piece of material. If this statement is to be taken as only relevant piece of evidence, then entire transaction of these shares in the stock exchange from last several years should be treated as bogus and this scrip was used

ASHUTOSH MISHRA,LUCKNOW vs. CIT(A), VARANASAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year: 2009-10 Ashutosh Mishra, Vs Assessing Officer, 3/144, Vinay Khand, Circle-3, Gomti Nagar, Varanasi. Lucknow – 226 010. Pan: Adgpm1827Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ashish Bansal, Advocate Revenue By : Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.09.2023 Order Per B.R. Baskaran, Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Challenging The Order Dated 05.02.2016 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Varanasi & It Relates To Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By The Decision Of The Ld.Cit(A) In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.90 Lakhs Made By The Ao.

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 69A

reopened the assessment of the year under consideration on receiving an information that the assessee has paid Rs.90 lakhs to a person named Shri Kalu Hasan, Dhanpura for purchase of one property. Before the AO, the assessee appeared once and sought adjournment . Thereafter, the assessee did not appear and was seeking adjournment from time to time. The assessee also