ASHUTOSH MISHRA,LUCKNOW vs. CIT(A), VARANASAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 88/ALLD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Amit Shuklaassessment Year: 2009-10 Ashutosh Mishra, Vs Assessing Officer, 3/144, Vinay Khand, Circle-3, Gomti Nagar, Varanasi. Lucknow – 226 010. Pan: Adgpm1827Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ashish Bansal, Advocate Revenue By : Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.09.2023 Order Per B.R. Baskaran, Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Challenging The Order Dated 05.02.2016 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Varanasi & It Relates To Assessment Year 2009-10. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By The Decision Of The Ld.Cit(A) In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.90 Lakhs Made By The Ao.
For Appellant: Shri Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 69A
reopened the assessment of the year under consideration on receiving an information that the assessee has paid Rs.90 lakhs to a person named Shri Kalu
Hasan, Dhanpura for purchase of one property. Before the AO, the assessee appeared once and sought adjournment . Thereafter, the assessee did not appear and was seeking adjournment from time to time. The assessee also