BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 144clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai751Delhi557Bangalore310Kolkata212Chennai187Hyderabad153Ahmedabad136Karnataka114Pune111Raipur106Jaipur97Cochin93Chandigarh61Surat47Indore45Lucknow39Visakhapatnam28Patna26Rajkot22Jodhpur20Amritsar18Nagpur16Agra14Jabalpur14Cuttack11Panaji7Allahabad7Guwahati6SC5Telangana5Varanasi5Calcutta3Ranchi3Dehradun2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 80I13Section 14810Section 1444Section 143(2)3Section 2543Addition to Income3Section 124(3)(a)2Section 124(2)2Section 250(1)2Deduction

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

ITA 135/VNS/2020[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi05 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 124(1)(a)Section 124(2)Section 124(3)(a)Section 250(1)Section 255(4)Section 69A

144. (1) If any person- • fails to make the return required under sub-section (1) of section 139 and has not made a return or a revised return under sub-section (4) or sub- section (5) of that section, or • fails to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under sub-section (1) of section 142 or fails

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 2, VARANASI

2

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 213/VNS/2019[201-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

144 is valid. Thus, the contentions raised by assessee on legal grounds were rejected by ld. CIT(A) 4f. So far as the quantum additions on merit is concerned , the learned CIT(A) observed that the assessee has submitted that she had applied for a job with M/s. Oven Commerce Pvt. Ltd. 56/2 Kings Road, Howrah, Kolkata

MOUSAMI CHOUDHURY,VARANASI vs. DY. CIT, RANGE - 02,, VARANASI

In the result , the appeal filed the assessee in ITA No

ITA 214/VNS/2019[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi28 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh.ArvindShukla, Adv. & Sh. AsimZafar, AdvFor Respondent: ShriA.K. Singh, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148

144 is valid. Thus, the contentions raised by assessee on legal grounds were rejected by ld. CIT(A) 4f. So far as the quantum additions on merit is concerned , the learned CIT(A) observed that the assessee has submitted that she had applied for a job with M/s. Oven Commerce Pvt. Ltd. 56/2 Kings Road, Howrah, Kolkata

M/S TIWARI CONSTRUCTIONS,SONEBHADRA vs. ITO, WARD -3(4), SONEBHADRA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 82/VNS/2019[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi07 Jun 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Tiwari Constructions Dibulganj, V. Income Tax Officer, Anpara, Sonebhadra, U.P. Ward-3(4), Sonebhadra Pan-Aafhj0966G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 24.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.06.2022

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)

144 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has received against the contract work of Rs. 453,86,361/- but declared net profit at Rs. 2,68,120/- after salary and interest to the partners. Thus the assessee declared net profit rate of 0.59% whereas in the just immediately preceding year, the assessee has shown

KAMAKHYA FRESH FOODS LTD.,GHAZIPUR vs. DY. CIT, CIRCLE - 03, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesseein

ITA 113/VNS/2019[1998-1999]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi19 Apr 2022AY 1998-1999

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year:1998-99 Kamakhya Fresh Foods The Deputy Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 45, Aamghat, Circle-3, Sahkari Colony, Varanasi, U.P. Ghazipur U.P. 233001 Pan: Aacck 2212P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: ShriSubhash Chand And ShriAshutoshBhardwajFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 254Section 80I

144 of the Actvide assessment order , dated 20.03.2001and the income of the assesseewas assessed Rs. 3,03,11,280/- wherein the AO made certain additions to the income of the assessee, while also taking into account the declaration of the assessee in the computation of total income that “No deduction on account of 80IA have been claimed 7 Assessment