SACHIT HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.,,GORAKHPUR vs. JCIT, TDS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kochar

TDS), Allahabad Range, Lines, Gorakhpur, U.P. Allahabad PAN-AAHCS3945G TAN-ALDS02773D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 26.05.2022 Date of pronouncement: 26.05.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These four appeals by the assessee are directed against the four separate orders of the CIT(A) all dated 25.10.2018 arising from

SACHIT HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. JCIT, TDS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kochar

TDS), Allahabad Range, Lines, Gorakhpur, U.P. Allahabad PAN-AAHCS3945G TAN-ALDS02773D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 26.05.2022 Date of pronouncement: 26.05.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These four appeals by the assessee are directed against the four separate orders of the CIT(A) all dated 25.10.2018 arising from

SACHIT HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.,GORAKHPUR vs. JCIT, TDS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kochar

TDS), Allahabad Range, Lines, Gorakhpur, U.P. Allahabad PAN-AAHCS3945G TAN-ALDS02773D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 26.05.2022 Date of pronouncement: 26.05.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These four appeals by the assessee are directed against the four separate orders of the CIT(A) all dated 25.10.2018 arising from

SACHIT HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.,,GORAKHPUR vs. JCIT, TDS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals in ITA Nos

Bench: Hon’Ble Sh.Vijay Pal Rao & Hon’Ble Sh. Ramit Kochar

TDS), Allahabad Range, Lines, Gorakhpur, U.P. Allahabad PAN-AAHCS3945G TAN-ALDS02773D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: None Respondent by: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 26.05.2022 Date of pronouncement: 26.05.2022 O R D E R PER BENCH: These four appeals by the assessee are directed against the four separate orders of the CIT(A) all dated 25.10.2018 arising from

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2 (1),, VARANASI vs. PROMINENT DATAMATICS MARKETING PVT. LTD., , VARANASI

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC of the Act is initiated for addition made u/s 69A of the Act, which is factually wrong. The aforesaid (para 1 page 4 of the impugned assessment order) itself shows that the Assessing Officer has made the said addition of Rs.2,64,90,092/- owing to difference of two figures i.e. Rs.2,73,59,647 - Rs.8

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS has also been attracted by the Principals awarding the work. The nature of activities of the appellant are akin to the activity of any other developer, builder or colonizer. 9. Thus, it is clear that income derived by the assessee from above sources are purely in the nature of commercial activities, the S.2(15) of IT Act clearly provides

M/S. VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VARANASI

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS has also been attracted by the Principals awarding the work. The nature of activities of the appellant are akin to the activity of any other developer, builder or colonizer. 9. Thus, it is clear that income derived by the assessee from above sources are purely in the nature of commercial activities, the S.2(15) of IT Act clearly provides

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS has also been attracted by the Principals awarding the work. The nature of activities of the appellant are akin to the activity of any other developer, builder or colonizer. 9. Thus, it is clear that income derived by the assessee from above sources are purely in the nature of commercial activities, the S.2(15) of IT Act clearly provides

VARANASI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,VARANASEE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

TDS has also been attracted by the Principals awarding the work. The nature of activities of the appellant are akin to the activity of any other developer, builder or colonizer. 9. Thus, it is clear that income derived by the assessee from above sources are purely in the nature of commercial activities, the S.2(15) of IT Act clearly provides