BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 89clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,397Mumbai2,311Bangalore692Chennai598Karnataka574Jaipur459Kolkata458Ahmedabad453Hyderabad335Indore253Chandigarh198Cochin156Pune128Surat117Agra92Rajkot88Visakhapatnam84Raipur81Cuttack80Telangana71Lucknow69Guwahati68Calcutta60Nagpur58Jodhpur37Allahabad37Ranchi26SC24Amritsar21Patna13Dehradun11Jabalpur8Rajasthan7Orissa6Panaji5Varanasi4Uttarakhand3Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 1732

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur vs. Rajan Rajesh Kumar

The Appeal stands dismissed without being admitted

ITA/12/2024HC Uttarakhand17 Dec 2025

Bench: This Court Being Aggrieved By The Judgment & Order Dated 08.02.2024, Whereby The Appellate Tribunal Was Pleased To Allow The Appeal Of The Respondent. 3.

For Appellant: Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel
Section 133ASection 151

89 of 2012, decided on 14.10.2014) and finally, on the ruling of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Chhugamal Rajpal vs. S.P. Chaliha & others reported in (1971) 79 ITR 0603. The relevant paragraphs have been extracted by the Tribunal in support of its findings. 19. In Paragraph-16, the Tribunal has recorded that there is no independent application of mind

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand
05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

89,757/- and Rs.1,38,229/- respectively to the claimants, which has been subjected to challenge to the present Appeal from Order. 2. Before venturing to answer the questions raised by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, while putting a challenge to the impugned award, some basic facts and features are required to be dealt with by this Court

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

89,757/- and Rs.1,38,229/- respectively to the claimants, which has been subjected to challenge to the present Appeal from Order. 2. Before venturing to answer the questions raised by the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, while putting a challenge to the impugned award, some basic facts and features are required to be dealt with by this Court