BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 50clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,550Mumbai4,736Bangalore1,401Kolkata1,185Chennai1,091Ahmedabad807Karnataka688Jaipur675Hyderabad604Surat436Indore391Chandigarh380Pune369Raipur236Cochin212Rajkot201Nagpur137Telangana122Visakhapatnam117Lucknow114Amritsar92Calcutta84Guwahati80Cuttack75Jodhpur67SC65Allahabad61Ranchi56Patna55Agra41Panaji40Dehradun21Varanasi18Jabalpur15Rajasthan12Orissa11Kerala5Uttarakhand4Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Addition to Income4Section 1732Section 682

CRESCENT CONTROL PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

ITA/5/2013HC Uttarakhand07 Aug 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,SRI NARAYAN SINGH DHANIK, J.

Section 143Section 253Section 68

50,000/-. The same was complied with. However, the balance confirmation in respect of M/s B.K. Vinod & Co. Pvt. Ltd, Delhi for an amount of Rs. 48,690/-, M/s Chuni Lal Keval Krishna, Delhi for an amount of Rs. 24,960/-, M/s S.K. Engg. Works, Ghaziabad for an amount of Rs. 23,142/- and M/s S.R. Electricals, Delhi

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur vs. Rajan Rajesh Kumar

The Appeal stands dismissed without being admitted

ITA/12/2024HC Uttarakhand
17 Dec 2025

Bench: This Court Being Aggrieved By The Judgment & Order Dated 08.02.2024, Whereby The Appellate Tribunal Was Pleased To Allow The Appeal Of The Respondent. 3.

For Appellant: Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel
Section 133ASection 151

Sections 147 to 151 are subject to judicial review. 47. In that view and in view of the fact that it is no more res integra that the settled law in this regard being reflection of application of mind, this Court can safely conclude that the law-makers and the Parliament did not deem it necessary to vest

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

Section 173 of the Act, and can be an argument be at all pressed in the absence of pleading and evidence of contributory negligence. 22. Based on the aforesaid issues, the learned Tribunal has proceeded to decide the Claim Petition by the impugned award and thereby awarding the compensation as referred to above. 10 23. The matter was addressed

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

Section 173 of the Act, and can be an argument be at all pressed in the absence of pleading and evidence of contributory negligence. 22. Based on the aforesaid issues, the learned Tribunal has proceeded to decide the Claim Petition by the impugned award and thereby awarding the compensation as referred to above. 10 23. The matter was addressed