BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 33clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,432Mumbai3,662Bangalore1,407Chennai884Ahmedabad871Jaipur688Karnataka688Kolkata684Hyderabad665Surat401Indore397Pune368Chandigarh344Cochin294Raipur226Visakhapatnam161Rajkot131Agra123Nagpur112Lucknow108Telangana106Amritsar104Cuttack86Calcutta69Ranchi68SC66Jabalpur64Guwahati55Allahabad54Jodhpur50Patna39Panaji34Dehradun22Varanasi15Rajasthan11Orissa9Kerala6Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 1732

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

Section 173 of the Act, and can be an argument be at all pressed in the absence of pleading and evidence of contributory negligence. 22. Based on the aforesaid issues, the learned Tribunal has proceeded to decide the Claim Petition by the impugned award and thereby awarding the compensation as referred to above. 10 23. The matter was addressed

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

Section 173 of the Act, and can be an argument be at all pressed in the absence of pleading and evidence of contributory negligence. 22. Based on the aforesaid issues, the learned Tribunal has proceeded to decide the Claim Petition by the impugned award and thereby awarding the compensation as referred to above. 10 23. The matter was addressed

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Kanpur vs. Rajan Rajesh Kumar

The Appeal stands dismissed without being admitted

ITA/12/2024HC Uttarakhand17 Dec 2025

Bench: This Court Being Aggrieved By The Judgment & Order Dated 08.02.2024, Whereby The Appellate Tribunal Was Pleased To Allow The Appeal Of The Respondent. 3.

For Appellant: Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel
Section 133ASection 151

33. As regards the second query, the learned A.O. has fairly conceded that there is no remedy available to the A.O. in the event of the Competent Authority refusing approval. 34. The very fact that the scope and ambit of the Act of 1961 does not provide for any remedy / remedies to the A.O. against the order of approval