BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai22,331Delhi16,917Chennai6,538Kolkata6,149Bangalore5,784Ahmedabad2,540Pune2,193Hyderabad1,679Jaipur1,458Surat1,033Indore949Chandigarh824Cochin815Karnataka780Raipur619Rajkot613Visakhapatnam557Nagpur494Amritsar439Lucknow439Cuttack358Agra216Telangana213Panaji211Jodhpur206Patna188Ranchi183Guwahati180Calcutta170SC147Dehradun139Allahabad93Jabalpur84Kerala74Varanasi59Punjab & Haryana40Orissa17Rajasthan11Himachal Pradesh8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7Uttarakhand2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1J&K1Bombay1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 408Section 194J3Section 194C2Section 682Addition to Income2

Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation 3 vs. Samsung Heavy Industries Company Limited

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA/10/2024HC Uttarakhand10 Jul 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. NARENDAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA

Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 194JSection 260Section 40

4 2025:UHC:5945-DB the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court and decision rendered by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court referred (supra) and hold that section 40(a)(ia) of the Act cannot be made applicable for short deduction of tax at source. Accordingly, the ld AO is hereby directed to delete the disallowance

CRESCENT CONTROL PVT LTD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed

ITA/5/2013HC Uttarakhand07 Aug 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,SRI NARAYAN SINGH DHANIK, J.

Section 143Section 253Section 68

section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Shri P.R. Mullick, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the assessing officer has committed an error in disallowing the same. Sufficient material existed in order to indicate that all the purchases were genuine. Even otherwise, the genuineness of the transactions has not been disputed. In support whereof he relies