BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 9(1)(v)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,231Delhi2,985Bangalore2,005Chennai1,508Kolkata733Ahmedabad409Hyderabad385Cochin370Pune345Jaipur304Raipur281Karnataka261Chandigarh241Indore165Surat134Nagpur118Visakhapatnam101Lucknow99Rajkot96Amritsar71Cuttack64Jabalpur43Telangana42Patna40Guwahati40Jodhpur39Dehradun33Agra30Panaji27Ranchi24Allahabad20SC16Varanasi15Kerala13Calcutta8Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan4Uttarakhand2J&K1Orissa1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 1732Addition to Income2

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

v) (b) of the Insurance Act. 16. There have been an independent written statement, being paper No. 33 Ga, which was filed by the opposite party No. 5, to the Claim Petition, i.e. the Insurer of the Santro Car, who had attributed the entire negligence and liability, as per the pleadings raised in para 20 and 21 of the written

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

v) (b) of the Insurance Act. 16. There have been an independent written statement, being paper No. 33 Ga, which was filed by the opposite party No. 5, to the Claim Petition, i.e. the Insurer of the Santro Car, who had attributed the entire negligence and liability, as per the pleadings raised in para 20 and 21 of the written