BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 4clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,114Delhi6,007Bangalore2,818Chennai2,488Kolkata1,777Pune1,194Ahmedabad777Hyderabad685Cochin637Karnataka565Patna557Jaipur479Raipur445Indore427Nagpur362Chandigarh354Surat254Visakhapatnam245Rajkot207Lucknow179Cuttack143Amritsar125Jodhpur110Dehradun96Ranchi80Panaji77Telangana77Jabalpur76Agra68Guwahati62Varanasi29SC26Allahabad25Calcutta24Kerala18Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Bombay1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 1732

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

4 of C.P.C., and having not done so, and coupled with the observation, which has been made by the Tribunal in its order of 12th September, 2013, that none of the parties apart from the issues framed on 12th September, 2013, have not pressed any other issues before the Tribunal. 21. The question would be, that when the appellant

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

4 of C.P.C., and having not done so, and coupled with the observation, which has been made by the Tribunal in its order of 12th September, 2013, that none of the parties apart from the issues framed on 12th September, 2013, have not pressed any other issues before the Tribunal. 21. The question would be, that when the appellant

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION vs. M/S DEEPWATER PACIFIC 1 INC

ITA/11/2022HC Uttarakhand02 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE

Section 31Section 53

4. Hence, the total tax payable was held to be Rs. 1,26,909.15. 5. In the facts of the present case, the Tax Assessing Officer vide order dated 15.11.2016 held that the respondent was a trader and after mining the goods, was selling sand, concrete, grid, etc. As per the Report received from the Special Investigation Branch Rudrapur Unit