BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,497Delhi5,207Bangalore2,015Chennai1,866Kolkata1,695Ahmedabad670Hyderabad659Pune498Jaipur430Raipur348Chandigarh325Indore323Surat222Karnataka221Cochin219Patna200Rajkot166Visakhapatnam153Lucknow144Cuttack130Nagpur123Amritsar101Ranchi82Jodhpur65Guwahati57Agra56Dehradun43Jabalpur41Telangana35Panaji33Varanasi23Allahabad22SC16Calcutta15Kerala10Rajasthan6Himachal Pradesh6Orissa4Uttarakhand3Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Bombay1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 1732

Hari Mohan Sarswat vs. DCIT CIRCLE

ITA/42/2015HC Uttarakhand05 Mar 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

Section 173

TDS deduction made as per the income tax document, which was placed on record was not tenable, to be taken as basis to decide the quantum of compensation. 24. With all due reverence at my command, I am not in league with the arguments which had been extended by the learned Senior Counsel, on all the above aspects

M/S SIEM OFFSHORE INC. vs. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

ITA/43/2015HC Uttarakhand24 Nov 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDRA MAITHANI

Section 173

TDS deduction made as per the income tax document, which was placed on record was not tenable, to be taken as basis to decide the quantum of compensation. 24. With all due reverence at my command, I am not in league with the arguments which had been extended by the learned Senior Counsel, on all the above aspects

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION vs. M/S DEEPWATER PACIFIC 1 INC

ITA/11/2022HC Uttarakhand02 Nov 2022

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE

Section 31Section 53

additional sale had been made by the trader except the sale of 1,67,638 quintal as assessed by the First Appellate Court. Due to lack of any evidence, the total sale of sand and bajri of the river was taken to be 1,67,638 quintal and the sale was assessed at Rs. 17,43,435/- and the sale