Search: transfer pricing

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 263(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 9(1)(vi)5 Section 143(3)4 Section 2602 Section 1072

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Accordingly answered against the Revenue. The appeals fail and are dismissed, without

ITTA/473/2012HC Telangana09 Jul 2013

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 260ASection 9(1)(vi)

price paid by the customer to the assessee and states that this is disproportionately high in comparison to the cost incurred by the assessee for the transponder. This according to the AO lead to an inference that the customers are compensating the assessee for not only the transponder cost but also the cost of the satellite. The AO did this

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agriculturel Market Committee,

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed

ITTA/219/2011HC Telangana

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agriculturel Market Committee,

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Laila Impex,

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Agriculturel Market Committee,

The Commissioner of Income Tax (IT and TP) vs. M/s. Idea Cellular Limited

Suchirindia Infratech Pvt. Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-Tax

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,

V.C. NANNAPANENI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,