Search: transfer pricing

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 239clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

M/S VAIBHAV vs. JOINT COMM. OF INCOME TAX RANGE 3 HYD

Appeal is allowed and the judgments and decrees passed by the

ITTA/58/2002HC Telangana14 Sept 2022

Bench: The Learned Trial Court) Was Allowed & The Judgment & Decree Dated 12.12.2000, Passed By Learned Senior Sub Judge, Kullu Was Set-Aside. (Parties Shall Hereinafter Be Referred To In

For Appellant: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with

price, and he will have a charge on the property for the unpaid purchase money. This is a non-possessory charge in terms of Section 55(4)(b) of the Act. 7. The factual position needs a reference for the application of the legal position, Muralidhar Mohanty (D.W. 4) is the husband of defendant No. 1. From his evidence

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

ITTA/621/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 260A

M/S VAIBHAV vs. JOINT COMM. OF INCOME TAX RANGE 3 HYD

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

M/S VAIBHAV vs. JOINT COMM. OF INCOME TAX RANGE 3 HYD

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,