Search: section 68

9 results for “section 68”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 224 Section 260A3 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 2602 Section 143(3)2 Section 3022 Section 3642 Section 2012 Addition to Income2 Penalty

The Commissioner of Income Tax - II vs. M/s. Kumar Raja Associates

In the result, all the Tax Revision

ITTA/191/2008HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: Floor, Opp.Gurudware Bus Stop, Th Stat, 0/O.Meghana Towers, 4 Visakhapatnam. ... Petitioner & M/S.Pulp-N-Pack [P] Limited, Tadimalla ... Respondent : Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, Gp For Commercial Tax Counsel For The Respondent : Sri S Suribabu, Representing On Behalf Of Sri S R R Viswanath Counsel For The Petitioner

For Respondent: Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, GP for Commercial Tax

Section 22

271, para 13.] Nevertheless, in a situation where there is ambiguity in the meaning of the text, the courts must also give due regard to the consequences of the interpretation taken. 21. It is the responsibility of the courts to interpret the text in a marmer which eliminates any element of hardship, inconvenience, injustice, absurdity or anomaly. [G.P. Singh

Commissioenr of Income Tax vs. Dr. T. Ravi Kumar

ITTA/399/2011HC Telangana

The Commissioner of Income Tax - II vs. M/s. Kumar Raja Associates

Commissioenr of Income Tax vs. Dr. T. Ravi Kumar

The Commissioner of Income Tax - II vs. M/s. Kumar Raja Associates

Commissioenr of Income Tax vs. Dr. T. Ravi Kumar

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Agricultural Market Committee

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Kokivenkateswara Reddy AND others,

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain