BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 23(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi227Mumbai119Kolkata119Ahmedabad106Jaipur69Agra63Chandigarh38Bangalore36Chennai31Raipur24Hyderabad20Indore18Guwahati12Pune10Cuttack9Varanasi8Jodhpur7Rajkot5Lucknow5Surat5Karnataka4Telangana4SC3Allahabad3Amritsar2Cochin2Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Addition to Income4

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. M/S I SPACE GLOBAL SERVICES [INDIA] PVT LTD., HYDERABAD

Appeal stands disposed of

ITTA/332/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

23. Although, the judgments referred to above were cited at the Bar in the High Court, which were taken note of by the learned Judges of the Bench of the High Court, but without either recording its agreement or dissent, it answered the two questions referred to it in favour of the Revenue. Judicial decorum, propriety and discipline required that

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHRI M.SURYA NARAYANA RAJU

Appeal stands disposed of

ITTA/327/2017HC Telangana21 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

23. Although, the judgments referred to above were cited at the Bar in the High Court, which were taken note of by the learned Judges of the Bench of the High Court, but without either recording its agreement or dissent, it answered the two questions referred to it in favour of the Revenue. Judicial decorum, propriety and discipline required that

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), HYD vs. M/S GOMATI AGRO FARMS PVT LTD., HYD

Appeal stands disposed of

ITTA/725/2017HC Telangana22 Nov 2017

Bench: C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,T.AMARNATH GOUD

23. Although, the judgments referred to above were cited at the Bar in the High Court, which were taken note of by the learned Judges of the Bench of the High Court, but without either recording its agreement or dissent, it answered the two questions referred to it in favour of the Revenue. Judicial decorum, propriety and discipline required that

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K. V. Srinivasa Rao

Appeal stands disposed of

ITTA/479/2017HC Telangana01 Aug 2017

23. Although, the judgments referred to above were cited at the Bar in the High Court, which were taken note of by the learned Judges of the Bench of the High Court, but without either recording its agreement or dissent, it answered the two questions referred to it in favour of the Revenue. Judicial decorum, propriety and discipline required that