BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “section 68”+ Section 10A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi265Mumbai213Bangalore200Pune59Chennai45Kolkata40Ahmedabad35Hyderabad33Jaipur33Calcutta16Surat16Indore13Lucknow11Visakhapatnam10Karnataka10Telangana8Guwahati7Rajkot7Chandigarh7SC4Patna3Raipur2Rajasthan2Varanasi2Dehradun1Orissa1Cochin1Allahabad1Cuttack1Panaji1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1O3Section 2602Section 252Section 12A2Exemption2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMEE TAX-III vs. M/S.V.B.C.FERRO ALLOYS LTD

THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED

ITTA/506/2006HC Telangana15 Oct 2024

Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

For Appellant: Sri J.V. prasad (Sr. SC FOR TNCOME TAX)For Respondent: Sri Challa Gunaranjan
Section 1Section 1OSection 260

10A or Section jOB or Section 11 or Section 12 applg, if any such amount is cred.ited to tLrc profit and loss account. " 18. This court while gone through tl-re judgments relied upon by both counsels. In Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai Vs. M/s Dilip Kumar and Compang & Others (2"d supra) it is held

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

ITTA/627/2015HC Telangana02 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 260Section 80G(5)

10A on 22nd February, 2006. The said application came to be rejected by an order dated 22nd August, 2006 for non- compliance of few queries. The said order came to be set aside by the ITAT vide its order dated 14th November, 2006 and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, vide

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

ITTA/3/2020HC Telangana25 Aug 2020

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

ITTA/108/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 18 and explained its significance in the following words: ―22. The significance of Section 18 of the Act can be understood in the light of the above provisions. Section 18 provides for provisional assessment of duty in cases specified in sub-section (1) of the section. Clause (c) of sub-section (1) deals

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

ITTA/94/2022HC Telangana24 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Section 18 and explained its significance in the following words: ―22. The significance of Section 18 of the Act can be understood in the light of the above provisions. Section 18 provides for provisional assessment of duty in cases specified in sub-section (1) of the section. Clause (c) of sub-section (1) deals

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K.V.Srinivasa Rao

The appeal is partly allowed

ITTA/449/2017HC Telangana18 Jul 2017

Bench: SANJAY KUMAR,GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD

For Appellant: Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate
Section 166

Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act’) for grant of compensation on account of the death of Sh. Vikram Singh as the result of motor vehicle accident. 3. It was alleged that Sh. Vikram Singh had died in a motor vehicle accident involving vehicle No. HP-10A- 5266 (Ford Figo Car). As per claimants

Commissioner of Income tax, vs. M/s. Southern Rocks and Minerals Private Limited

ITTA/597/2013HC Telangana17 Dec 2013

10A of CPC, 1908 to be presented in the Court of competent jurisdiction. 10. Thereafter, the present suit for mandatory injunction for realization of the mesne profits/damages was filed before this Court. The prayer in the suit is confined to the claim for a preliminary decree followed by a final decree, for determination of damages/mesne profits at the market rate

The commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s Lanco Kondapalli Power (P) Ltd

ITTA/121/2013HC Telangana26 Jul 2013

10a Surekha Mahendra kumar Shah 10b Mahendrakumar Mafatlal Shah, both of Mumbai Indian Inhabitants, having present address at A/1003 Gokul Vrindavan, Shantilal Modi X Road No.2, Kandivali (West), Mumbai 400 067. 11a Atul Shakaralal Shah 11b Alpa Atul Shah, both adults, of Mumbai, Indian Inhabitants, having present address at B/104 Shanti Apartment No.1, Mathuradas Ext Road, Kandivali (West), Mumbai