BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,276Mumbai1,106Bangalore409Chennai340Jaipur333Kolkata300Ahmedabad253Hyderabad149Chandigarh110Rajkot99Pune88Surat78Amritsar69Indore65Raipur59Nagpur59Guwahati44Patna43Cochin31Jodhpur29Lucknow27Cuttack23Agra21Visakhapatnam18Allahabad9Karnataka8Dehradun6Jabalpur6SC4Gauhati3Panaji3Kerala2Ranchi2Telangana2Orissa2

Key Topics

Section 1587Section 1475Section 1324Section 364Section 1483Section 143(3)3Addition to Income2

COMM.OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES HYD

In the result, Income Tax Appeal No

ITTA/3/2000HC Telangana02 Jan 2012

Bench: This Court & Hence Both Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Common Judgment. 2. Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate Have Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Sri Manish Goel, Advocate Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of Revenue. 3. Revenue'S Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- (1)Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Tribunal Was Right In Holding That Authorization For Search

For Appellant: - M/S Verma Roadways Through its Partner R.K.VermaFor Respondent: - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Section 132Section 158Section 260A

reassessment” in Section 132B shall be construed as references to “block assessment” . (emphasis applied) 26. Photocopy of warrant of authorisation issued in Form 45 under Section 112(I) of Income Tax Rules, pursuant whereto search was conducted at Assessee's premises on 28.11.1996 was produced before Tribunal, which are quoted in para 11.2 of Tribunal's order and relevant extract

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Kaveri Bar AND Restaurant,

ITTA/575/2017HC Telangana03 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36

u/s 36(i)(iii) instead of Rs. 13.04 crore in the assessment order has resulted in escapement of income amount of Rs. 4.06 crore (13.04 crore less 8.98 crore). In view of the same I have reasons to believe that income to the tune of Rs. 4.06 crore has escaped assessment for the AY 2010-11 and needs