BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Disallowanceclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,542Delhi1,399Chennai658Bangalore512Kolkata439Jaipur297Ahmedabad276Hyderabad200Pune147Chandigarh141Surat133Raipur128Indore103Rajkot69Amritsar65Lucknow56Nagpur52Guwahati47Visakhapatnam44Cochin38Agra36Cuttack35Jodhpur35Allahabad35Patna27Karnataka17Panaji16Dehradun9Jabalpur5Telangana5Calcutta5Kerala4Varanasi3SC2Gauhati2Orissa2Ranchi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 1477Section 143(3)5Section 364Section 803Addition to Income3Section 80I2Reassessment2Disallowance

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Kaveri Bar AND Restaurant,

ITTA/575/2017HC Telangana03 Oct 2017

Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI,V RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36

Disallowance of the sum of Rs. 8.98 crore only u/s 36(i)(iii) instead of Rs. 13.04 crore in the assessment order has resulted in escapement of income amount of Rs. 4.06 crore (13.04 crore less 8.98 crore). In view of the same I have reasons to believe that income to the tune of Rs. 4.06 crore has escaped assessment

The Director of Income Tax, (Exemptions) vs. Royal Education Society

In the result, the appeal is disposed of

ITTA/392/2016HC Telangana20 Oct 2016
2

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

u/s 148 of the Act on the facts and circumstances of the case? (3) Whether the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that the appellant is not entitled to make additional claim of loss incurred of Rs.8,28,65,052/- in the re- assessment proceedings under section 147 of the Act on the facts and circumstances of the case

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

u/s 271(1)(c) r.w 274 of the Income-tax Act for concealment and furnishing of inaccurate particulars are initiated separately. (iv) The assessee has booked various expenses of contractual nature, vide order sheet entry dated 29.12.2009, the assessee was asked to show cause why the same should not disallowed u/s40a(ia). In response thereto the assessee has only filed

The Commissioner of Income Tax -V, vs. M/S Secunderabad Club

ITTA/422/2006HC Telangana27 Aug 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 148Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

u/s 80-lB of the Act in respect of any unit though entire profits were taken as eligible for such deduction; (b) The assessee‟s P & L account stated that unit-wise sale was allocated in the ratio of production cost and clearance made by each unit and further, in the Notes that various expenses have been allocated

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/S Foods Fats and Fertilisers Limited,

The appeals stand dismissed

ITTA/37/2009HC Telangana20 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 148

disallowed the claim for loss suffered by the Appellant-assessee in trading of Mustard undertaken through M/s Hari Agro Mills Private Ltd., Jamshedpur despite the same having been duly confirmed by the M/s Hari Agro Mills Private Ltd., Jamshedpur.?” DBITA No. 131/2009, DBITA No. 414/2009 i) Whether the ld. ITAT has erred in having taken the view that the issue