BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 275clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi288Mumbai228Jaipur94Ahmedabad75Chennai71Kolkata65Hyderabad61Bangalore60Cochin36Chandigarh31Indore30Surat21Pune20Raipur19Nagpur19Patna18Cuttack18Amritsar17Lucknow12Jodhpur10Visakhapatnam9Agra8Karnataka5Jabalpur3Rajkot3Ranchi3Telangana3Guwahati2SC2Dehradun1Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 1534Section 260A2Section 372Deduction2Reassessment2

M/s Kausalya Agro Farms and Developers pvt. ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/256/2022HC Telangana02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department

M/s. Dakshin Infrastructures Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

The appeals are allowed

ITTA/275/2022
HC Telangana
02 Feb 2023

Bench: N.TUKARAMJI,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 147Section 153Section 260ASection 37

275, 279, 281, 283, 284 and 294 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan) This order will dispose of the above batch of income tax appeals. 2. Heard Mr. Dwarakanath, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttam Reddy, learned counsel for the assessees/appellants and Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s.Viskha Container Terminal Private Limited

ITTA/439/2018HC Telangana08 Oct 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 143(2)Section 260Section 268

275 ITR 595 in the following manner:- “A reading of the above reproduced provision makes it clear that a mistake, defect or 12 omission in the return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding is not sufficient to invalidate an action taken by the competent authority, provided that such return of income, assessment, notice, summons or other proceeding