BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 35(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,297Mumbai1,041Jaipur301Bangalore291Ahmedabad265Indore174Chennai167Kolkata164Hyderabad132Karnataka128Pune113Chandigarh98Raipur74Surat74Rajkot57Lucknow43Calcutta35Visakhapatnam34Amritsar33Allahabad29Nagpur27Agra18Cuttack16Patna16Kerala14Dehradun14Cochin12Guwahati11SC8Panaji7Ranchi7Jabalpur5Telangana4Varanasi3Rajasthan2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 271(1)(c)2Section 3022Section 3642Section 2012Addition to Income2

Commissioenr of Income Tax vs. Dr. T. Ravi Kumar

ITTA/399/2011HC Telangana24 Jul 2013
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

ii) Whether under the facts in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the order of the CIT (A) of cancelling the penalty of Rs. 99,68,280/- levied u/s 271(1)(c) on account of inaccurate particulars furnished by assessee in original return and detected by the Assessing Officer during scrutiny u/s

The Commissioner of Income Tax -III vs. Sri T.C. Reddy

The appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/577/2011HC Telangana28 Feb 2012

ii) The assessee has also claimed capital expenditure of Rs. 168600/- as a revenue expenditure. The capital expenditure pertains to fees paid to Registrar of Companies for increasing the authorized capital of the company. This fact was brought to the notice of the assessee vide order sheet entry dated 29.12.2009. No satisfactory reply has been filed. It is therefore, disallowed

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

Section 27 begins with a proviso and states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered, in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered may be proved, 49 whether it amounts to a confession

PR COMMR OF INCOME TAX-2, HYDERABAD vs. K RAVINDER REDDY, HYDERABAD

ITTA/621/2017HC Telangana23 Aug 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 260A

ii) furnishing intimation in accordance with the requirements of the buyers; and, (iii) a discussion of commercial issues ITA 621/2017 & connected matters Page 59 of 85 pertaining to the contract through the technical representative, after which an order was placed by the buyer directly. Apart from this, it is significant that the performance of the personnel in India