BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “house property”+ Unexplained Moneyclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi931Mumbai825Chennai330Bangalore297Jaipur287Hyderabad219Chandigarh124Kolkata102Pune95Cochin92Ahmedabad89Indore80Rajkot59Surat54Amritsar47Nagpur47Visakhapatnam41Calcutta34Guwahati29Agra28Lucknow25Raipur17Jodhpur13Allahabad8Patna8Varanasi8Cuttack7Telangana5Dehradun5SC4Karnataka3Ranchi2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Punjab & Haryana1Orissa1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 1587Section 1324Section 13(1)(e)3Section 13(2)3Addition to Income3

COMM.OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES HYD

In the result, Income Tax Appeal No

ITTA/3/2000HC Telangana02 Jan 2012

Bench: This Court & Hence Both Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Common Judgment. 2. Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate Have Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Sri Manish Goel, Advocate Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of Revenue. 3. Revenue'S Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- (1)Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Tribunal Was Right In Holding That Authorization For Search

For Appellant: - M/S Verma Roadways Through its Partner R.K.VermaFor Respondent: - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Section 132Section 158Section 260A

Unexplained investment in house property No. 133/225 Rs. 3,40,000/- 16. Assessee preferred appeal against aforesaid order of assessment which has been partly allowed by Tribunal vide impugned judgment. Both parties have filed respective appeals to the extent order of Tribunal is against them. 17. Tribunal has considered various issues of Assessee and returned findings, in brief, as under

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II, vs. M/s Padmapriya Real Estates AND Financiers

In the result, the appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment passed by

ITTA/478/2006HC Telangana10 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 13(1)(e)Section 13(2)Section 313

unexplained expenditure during the check period was assessed at Rs. 3,31,696.46/- which is uncounted money of the appellant. 11. PW-36, P. K. Shukla is the Investigating Officer, in his detailed examination accepts the various documents Ex.P/99 is the sale deed in the name of the present appellant purchased from Devnarayan Mishra on 13.11.1992 for the consideration

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Jyothi Wines,

ITTA/226/2010HC Telangana30 Nov 2010

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.CORDIAL COMPANY
Section 153ASection 153CSection 292C

houses of the partners of one M/s.Artech Group which had close connections with the assessee-firms. One ITA. Nos.211, 226 & 366 of 2010 6 of the partners of M/s.Artech Group was also a partner in the assessee-firms. Documents were recovered in the search conducted in that other firm which related to the assessee-firms as also its partners

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Bheema Wines

ITTA/200/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 109Section 13Section 13(2)Section 161Section 482

money belonging to other accused cannot be fastened on the accused. Reliance is placed upon DSP Chennai vs K Insbasagaran (2006) 1 SCC 420 and State of Andhra Pradesh vs J. Satyanarayan JT 2000 (10) SC 430. Further reliance is placed upon Gapadibai vs State of Madhya Pradesh (1980) 2 SCC 327 to assert that in order to prove benami

Commissioner of Income Tax-V, vs. Sri Vinod Krishna Conjeevaram,

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/594/2013HC Telangana10 Dec 2013
Section 2(47)Section 260Section 45Section 45(4)Section 68

House, 1st Main, Mahalakshmi Layout Extn., Bangalore-560 086. ...RESPONDENT (By Sri A Shankar and Sri M Lava, Advocates) -0-0-0-0-0- This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 31.7.2013 passed in ITA No.764/Bang/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008- 09 to decide the foregoing question