BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi837Mumbai746Chennai274Jaipur265Bangalore240Surat187Hyderabad129Chandigarh104Kolkata99Cochin86Ahmedabad81Pune69Indore60Nagpur55Rajkot51Visakhapatnam42Amritsar35Calcutta34Guwahati28Agra25Lucknow22Raipur21Cuttack11Patna11Allahabad10Varanasi8Jodhpur7Karnataka4Telangana4SC2Dehradun2Jabalpur1Ranchi1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 3022Section 3642Section 2012

Commissioner of Income Tax-V, vs. Sri Vinod Krishna Conjeevaram,

The appeal is dismissed

ITTA/594/2013HC Telangana10 Dec 2013
Section 2(47)Section 260Section 45Section 45(4)Section 68

House, 1st Main, Mahalakshmi Layout Extn., Bangalore-560 086. ...RESPONDENT (By Sri A Shankar and Sri M Lava, Advocates) -0-0-0-0-0- This ITA is filed under Section 260-A of I.T. Act, 1961 arising out of Order dated 31.7.2013 passed in ITA No.764/Bang/2012 for the Assessment Year 2008- 09 to decide the foregoing question

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Bheema Wines

ITTA/200/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 109Section 13Section 13(2)Section 161Section 482

unexplained amount was 166% of the known sources of income. The learned Trial Court had considered the following aspects apropos the charge of disproportionate assets: ".......wherein it was alleged that accused R.C. Sabharwal had amazed huge assets which is disproportionate to his known Digitally signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:16.12.2020 13:19:29 Signature Not Verified

The Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Jyothi Wines,

ITTA/226/2010HC Telangana30 Nov 2010

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

For Appellant: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S.CORDIAL COMPANY
Section 153ASection 153CSection 292C

houses of the partners of one M/s.Artech Group which had close connections with the assessee-firms. One ITA. Nos.211, 226 & 366 of 2010 6 of the partners of M/s.Artech Group was also a partner in the assessee-firms. Documents were recovered in the search conducted in that other firm which related to the assessee-firms as also its partners

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

house” does not lead to the discovery of a knife; knives were discovered many years ago. It leads to the discovery of the fact that a knife is concealed in the house of the informant to his knowledge, and if the knife is proved to have been used in the commission of the offence, the fact discovered is very relevant