BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai96Delhi66Chandigarh49Chennai34Raipur31Ahmedabad28Kolkata18Bangalore12Pune11Indore11Hyderabad9Jaipur8Nagpur6Rajkot5Guwahati5Telangana4Agra4Surat3Jodhpur2Karnataka1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 1587Section 966Section 1324

COMM.OF INCOME TAX BANGALORE vs. NAVABHARAT ENTERPRISES HYD

In the result, Income Tax Appeal No

ITTA/3/2000HC Telangana02 Jan 2012

Bench: This Court & Hence Both Appeals Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Common Judgment. 2. Sri Ravi Kant, Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Rahul Agarwal, Advocate Have Appeared On Behalf Of Assessee & Sri Manish Goel, Advocate Has Put In Appearance On Behalf Of Revenue. 3. Revenue'S Appeal Was Admitted On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law:- (1)Whether On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, Tribunal Was Right In Holding That Authorization For Search

For Appellant: - M/S Verma Roadways Through its Partner R.K.VermaFor Respondent: - Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Section 132Section 158Section 260A

house property No. 133/225 Rs. 3,40,000/- 16. Assessee preferred appeal against aforesaid order of assessment which has been partly allowed by Tribunal vide impugned judgment. Both parties have filed respective appeals to the extent order of Tribunal is against them. 17. Tribunal has considered various issues of Assessee and returned findings, in brief, as under:- (a) Warrant

THEE COMMSSR.OF INCOME TAX.HYD. vs. CHALLA SHANKER REDDY.HYD.

ITTA/80/2002HC Telangana13 Dec 2013

Bench: L.NARASIMHA REDDY,T.SUNIL CHOWDARY

Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing

COMMR.OF I.T. RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S.NARAYANA CHOWDARYAND ORS KAKINADA

ITTA/82/2002HC Telangana10 Dec 2013

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - (TDS), vs. M/s. Suman Chit Funds (P) Ltd.,

ITTA/120/2013HC Telangana27 Jun 2013
Section 96

iIA Appeals. 4. For the s:rll: of convenience, we propose to Ceal witt the batch of Appeals in trr.. ;r:ts i.e., the ,.GpA Appeals" (2OO.2) and Lhe ,.partition Appeal" (2O)3 . 2 CCCA.Nos.77 . 80, 81 and 82 of 2002 - "GPA Appeals" 5. These Appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23 'O2 '2OOl dismissing