BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “house property”+ Section 120Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi16Telangana7Karnataka6Calcutta2Mumbai1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 3025Section 3643Section 2013Addition to Income3Section 1202Section 2162Section 342Section 272Section 252Revision u/s 2632

The Commissioner of Income Tax - I vs. M/s. BBL Foods (Earlier Amber Biscuits P Ltd.)

ITTA/242/2012HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

housing loans to them, without making proper pre-sanction verifications, and accepting forged income tax returns, and without ensuring the end use of funds. Sri.Joy was found guilty and convicted along with the other accused, and he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two years each and fine, under Section 120B read with Sections

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K. V. Srinivasa Rao

ITTA/480/2017HC Telangana01 Aug 2017
For Respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy
Section 120BSection 25Section 27
Section 302

120B of IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act and Narender Kumar with the commission of offences punishable under Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. 13 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:2282-DB ) 4. The prosecution examined 51 witnesses to prove its case. Ashwani Jain (PW1) is the cousin of the deceased Vinod Jain, who had rented

The Commissioner of Income-Tax - VI, vs. Shri Mekala Bal Reddy

ITTA/28/2013HC Telangana30 Jul 2013
For Appellant: - DevendraFor Respondent: - State of U.P
Section 148Section 149Section 157Section 302Section 307Section 372

120B I.P.C., the chargesheet submitted on 03.10.2008 was proved by P.W-10 as Exhibit Ka-'15', being under his signature. In cross, P.W-10 stated that he did not know as to how many persons were injured in the cross case and as to who was the accused person injured in the present case. He was further confronted about the statement

M/s Vodafone Essar South Ltd., vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income tax,

ITTA/313/2013HC Telangana31 Jul 2013
Section 13(1)(e)Section 13(2)

Sections 109, 465, 467, 471, 474, 420 r/w 120B of Indian Penal Code. 2. The case of prosecution is that the accused nos.2 to 12 have aided   and   abetted   the   accused   no.1   to   acquire   wealth   of Rs.2,66,28,628/­ disproportionate to his known source of income. 3. The gist of the prosecution case is that the accused no.1 while

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/s. Murala Venkateswara Rao AND others

Appeal is dismissed,

ITTA/190/2007HC Telangana22 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

For Appellant: 1.M.SRAVAN KUMAR, Spl. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR C.B.IFor Respondent: Sri K.Srinivasa Rao
Section 13Section 378(4)

120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for brevity ‘IPC’) and Sections 7 and 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of the PC Act, 1988. Originally, the Auditor, wz. Eswara Rama Somayajulu 5. of P.W1, at first instance, was arrayed as accused No.2. During the pendency of the case at the stage of examination of accused under Section

THE COMM. OF INCOME TAX RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S B.KRISHNA MURTHY AND OTHERS

ITTA/81/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 120Section 201Section 216Section 302Section 34Section 364

120B IPC (this was the first charge). The further case of the prosecution is that, under the pretext of discussing the opening of a new franchise of PPL at Vikas Marg, which would be financed by A-1, A-1 called for a meeting of SS, SK and DG at the MCD office at Okhla, from where A-1 used

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. Shri Raaj Kumar Jain

ITTA/147/2013HC Telangana28 Jun 2013
For Appellant: - Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assistedFor Respondent: - A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan
Section 156(3)Section 201Section 302Section 363Section 364Section 366Section 376

Section 313 Cr.P.C. Accused has denied his implication in the case/offence and has claimed that he was tortured and that his nails were extracted, his genitals were burnt and petrol was put in his anus. He offered to get himself medically examined to prove his allegations. The accused SK also claimed that he was extended other tortures and the C.B.I