BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 56(2)(viii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi990Mumbai858Bangalore298Ahmedabad188Kolkata126Jaipur124Chennai124Cochin116Chandigarh104Indore100Hyderabad92Nagpur80Pune63Cuttack53Guwahati47Visakhapatnam40Calcutta39Rajkot34Ranchi33Surat31Lucknow31Raipur27Jodhpur14Patna14Agra13Amritsar11Karnataka10Allahabad7Dehradun7Telangana7SC6Kerala5Varanasi4Rajasthan2Himachal Pradesh1Jabalpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 375Deduction5Section 37(1)4Set Off of Losses4Section 252Section 12A2Section 362Section 36(1)(viii)2

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

ITTA/627/2015HC Telangana02 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 260Section 80G(5)

VIII. The Authorized Share Capital of the company will consist of Rs.1.00.00.000/-(Rupees One Crore only) divided into 10,00,000 (Ten Lacs.) Equity shares of Rs. 10/-(Rupees Ten only) each. IX. True accounts shall be kept of all sums of money received and expended by the Company and the matters in respect of which such receipts and expenditure

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Kalyani Wines

In the result, I find this appeal bereft of merit and accordingly,

ITTA/6/2010HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

Section 11Section 37

viii) It is settled principle of law that an order on the objections to an arbitration award should comply with the provisions of Order 20 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Court should state its finding on decision with the reasons therefore upon each separate issue. But, the learned Court, in a most perfunctory manner

The Commissiosner of Income Tax-III vs. M/s. SOL Pharmaceuticals Limited

The appeal stands disposed of

ITTA/17/2008HC Telangana02 Feb 2012
Section 143Section 28Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 56

2 of 4 during the relevant previous year 2001-02 was received from investment and deposits of surplus funds which were not immediately required for the purpose of assessee’s business. Under such circumstances, the said income did not fall within the ambit of Section 28 of the Income Tax Act and was assessed under the head “income from other

AD-AGE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING P LTD., HYDERABAD. vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONEER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD.

ITTA/54/2009HC Telangana22 Apr 2021

Bench: T.VINOD KUMAR,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

56 of 2008, 57 of 2008, 54 of 2009 and 20 of 2011 Reserved on: 21.12.2024 Date of decision : 31.12.2024. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax &another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1Yes

The Commissioner of Incoe Tax III, vs. Raj Breeders and Hatcheries (PVT) Liited,

ITTA/37/2007HC Telangana23 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

56 of 2008, 57 of 2008, 54 of 2009 and 20 of 2011 Reserved on: 21.12.2024 Date of decision : 31.12.2024. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax &another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1Yes

Commissioner of income tax, vs. M/s. R.K. Palace,

ITTA/57/2008HC Telangana14 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

56 of 2008, 57 of 2008, 54 of 2009 and 20 of 2011 Reserved on: 21.12.2024 Date of decision : 31.12.2024. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax &another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1Yes

Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Agricultural Market Committee

ITTA/20/2011HC Telangana30 Mar 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260Section 37Section 37(1)

56 of 2008, 57 of 2008, 54 of 2009 and 20 of 2011 Reserved on: 21.12.2024 Date of decision : 31.12.2024. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant. Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax &another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1Yes