BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,513Mumbai1,485Chennai670Kolkata654Bangalore543Ahmedabad345Pune212Hyderabad188Jaipur171Raipur134Surat125Indore113Amritsar92Cochin80Chandigarh73Cuttack71Nagpur56Visakhapatnam55Rajkot54Lucknow34Agra33Jodhpur27Allahabad27Karnataka26Dehradun20Patna19Guwahati17SC11Varanasi9Calcutta7Ranchi6Telangana4Panaji3Jabalpur3Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1J&K1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 406Section 2602Section 40A(3)2Deduction2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

5 payments made to the doctors as envisaged under Section 194J of the Act. Therefore, an amount of Rs.65,32,000/- was disallowed by invoking Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. On the very same reason, an amount of Rs.45,69,998/- was disallowed on account of operation management service charges. 6. Aggrieved by the same, an appeal

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc

ITTA/111/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 21St July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Sumit Ghosh, Adv. ….For Appellant. Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 260ASection 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 40A(3)

disallowed under Section 40A(3) of the Act. The next issue which was taken up by the assessing officer was with regard to the employees’ contribution to the Provident Fund and the assessing officer found that the amount was not deposited within the statutory due date and held it to be includible in the assessee’s income in terms

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Mohan Milk Line Private Limited,

ITTA/20/2014HC Telangana04 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 40

Sections 32, 40(a) (ia), 40A(3), 43B, etc. of the Act and other specific disallowances, related to the business activities against which the Chapter VI-A deduction has been claimed, result in enhancement of the profit of the eligible business, and that deduction under Chapter VI-A is admissible on the profit so enhanced by the disallowance. The said

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s. Charminar Breweries Ltd.,

ITTA/478/2011HC Telangana27 Jan 2012
Section 131Section 142Section 1aSection 44A

5,I29/- in the return filed on 2.12.2003 for the assessment year 2003-04. The return was processed under Section 1a3(l)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thereafter was selected for scrutiny. Apparently the Assessing Officer sent various notices to parties. During the course of proceedings the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee ' had entered into transactions