BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,530Mumbai1,502Chennai670Kolkata658Bangalore547Ahmedabad193Pune185Jaipur142Hyderabad137Raipur112Surat96Indore92Amritsar74Chandigarh64Nagpur57Cuttack50Visakhapatnam48Rajkot46Cochin43Lucknow41Karnataka31Agra28Jodhpur21Allahabad19Patna19Dehradun16Guwahati14SC12Calcutta8Ranchi5Varanasi5Telangana4Jabalpur3Kerala2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan1J&K1Panaji1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 406Section 40A(3)2Section 2602Addition to Income2Deduction2Disallowance2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

disallowing the expenses on which tax has not been deducted at source. 11. The same is disputed by the learned counsel for the respondent. 12. Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act reads as follows: “Section 40 – Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in sections 30 to 38, the following amounts shall not be deducted in 10 computing

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc

ITTA/111/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 21St July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Sumit Ghosh, Adv. ….For Appellant. Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 260ASection 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 40A(3)

Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ? v) Whether the Learned Tribunal was justified that during the Financial Year 2006-07 (A.Y 2007-08) the authorities below never doubted and/or disallowed

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s Mohan Milk Line Private Limited,

ITTA/20/2014HC Telangana04 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 260Section 40

disallowances made under Sections 32, 40(a) (ia), 40A(3), 43B, etc. of the Act and other specific disallowances, related

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s. Charminar Breweries Ltd.,

ITTA/478/2011HC Telangana27 Jan 2012
Section 131Section 142Section 1aSection 44A

disallowing the claim of loss declared in the retum of income furnished by the assessee. Thus for all these reasons and as the assessee has produced suffrcient material justifying its claim it is held that the entire exercise done by the AO is based on surmises and conjectures and without any evidence. The claim of loss as per the return