BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,231Delhi1,158Bangalore466Chennai461Kolkata447Ahmedabad189Hyderabad154Jaipur142Pune135Raipur120Surat82Indore76Chandigarh68Amritsar68Nagpur43Visakhapatnam41Lucknow32Cuttack29Rajkot23Allahabad23Agra21Karnataka20Jodhpur20Cochin14Guwahati13SC10Patna9Dehradun7Varanasi7Calcutta5Ranchi4Telangana3Punjab & Haryana2Panaji2Kerala2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 404Section 40A(3)2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

2) was issued and served on the assessee on 23.08.2007. In response to the same, the Internal Auditor has appeared and represented the case and produced various documents and books of account for verification. 4. On the question of depreciation, the Trust had claimed deduction towards depreciation allowance 4 amounting to Rs.8,41,36,636/- which includes depreciation

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc

ITTA/111/2022HC Telangana25 Sept 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 21St July, 2022. Appearance :- Mr. Sumit Ghosh, Adv. ….For Appellant. Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. ….For Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 260ASection 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 40A(3)

2 order dated 21st February, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, “B” Bench, Kolkata in ITA No.2067/Kol/2017 for the assessment years 2007-08. The appellant/assessee has raised the following substantial question of law for consideration: i) Whether the Learned Tribunal was justified in treating the outstanding liabilities of sundry creditors as unexplained cash credit when

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. M/s. Charminar Breweries Ltd.,

ITTA/478/2011HC Telangana27 Jan 2012
Section 131Section 142Section 1aSection 44A

2)(b) of the Act. This covered trading transactions as well as the advance received from the parties. The order of the Assessing Officer records that though summons were served under Section 131, the said parties did not join the proceedings and participate in it; the Assessing Officer in his order noted that the summons were returned with the remark