BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,027Mumbai957Bangalore318Chennai304Kolkata232Jaipur127Hyderabad112Ahmedabad92Chandigarh89Indore62Pune62Raipur53Lucknow40Panaji37Guwahati30Cochin29Patna23Surat21Rajkot21Allahabad19Karnataka15Cuttack14Visakhapatnam13Nagpur12Kerala8Ranchi8SC8Jodhpur7Amritsar7Telangana4Dehradun3Agra2Rajasthan2Calcutta1Varanasi1Orissa1

Key Topics

Addition to Income3Section 2932Section 272Section 252

Mr. K.S.N.Raju vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,

ITTA/418/2016HC Telangana03 Nov 2016

Bench: ANIS,SANJAY KUMAR

Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and acquitting co-accused Nandkishor Balreddy Kolyame (Koltame) and Subhash Virbhadrappa Kumbhar. 2. Appellant Subhash Ganesh Gir has filed Criminal Appeal No. 418 of 2016 taking exception to the impugned Judgment and Order referred to above, whereas; State has filed two appeals viz. Criminal Appeal

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. Sri. B. Yadagiri,

ITTA/13/2000HC Telangana01 Dec 2011

Bench: The Appellate Commissioner. On All The Three Aspects, Referred To Above, The Appellate Authority Held In Favour Of The Respondent. In The Further Appeal Filed By The Department Before The Tribunal, The View Taken By The Appellate Authority Was Confirmed.

For Appellant: Sri J.V.PrasadFor Respondent: Sri A.V.Raghuveer
Section 256(1)

220 ITR 298 2. 149 ITR 52 3. 233 ITR 468 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.13 of 2000 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The respondent herein is an assessee. The assessments for the years 1975-76 and 1985-86 to 1987-88 came

Commissioner of Income Tax -II vs. M/S Sri Ramanjaneya Poultry Farm Pvt., Ltd.,

ITTA/713/2006HC Telangana03 Dec 2013

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

Section 293

220(2) 1990-91 10,876.00 Rs. 10,876.00 1991-92 1,474.00 Rs. 1,474.00 1999-2000 15,86,347.00 3,70,798.00 Rs.19,57,145.00 2000-2001 22,75,638.00 5,31,927.00 Rs.28,07,565.00 2001-2002 11,54,322.00 57,720.00 Rs.12

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. K. V. Srinivasa Rao

ITTA/480/2017HC Telangana01 Aug 2017
For Respondent: Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy
Section 120BSection 25Section 27Section 302

disallowed. These were put during the cross-examination of Bankey, PW 30. They are: Q. Did you state to the investigating officer that the gang rolled the dead bodies of Nathi, Saktu and Bharat Singh and scrutinized them, and did you tell him that the face of Asa Ram resembled that of the deceased Bharat Singh? Q. Did you state